🔗 Share this article

The future president of the Oxford Union has been removed from his position after failing a vote of confidence that followed his controversial social media posts about Charlie Kirk.

The motion against George Abaraonye reached the required two-thirds threshold to oust him from his position, according to an announcement from the society.

Disputed Comments

The controversy erupted after Mr Abaraonye reportedly shared messages on online platforms that seemed to welcome the killing of Charlie Kirk, who was fatally shot while speaking at a university in the United States.

According to reports, one social media message reportedly stated "Charlie Kirk got shot loool" - using an extended form of the phrase 'lol'.

The student leader is also said to have posted in a messaging group with fellow students seeming to express approval of the event.

Election Results

The no-confidence motion took place over the recent days, with outcomes revealed on this week.

Official notices showed that over twelve hundred votes were cast in favor of removal, while just over five hundred were against the motion.

The announcement stated that the future president was considered to have stepped down in following the Oxford Union's rules.

Procedural Disputes

Voting operations were informally suspended early on Monday after the returning officer was reportedly subjected to "obstruction, intimidation, and unwarranted hostility" from several representatives.

In a statement, the student asserted that the count had been halted because election administrators believed "no legitimate and true result could be reached as a result of procedural failures".

His statement unequivocally denied that any person acting for the student had participated in threatening or obstructive conduct.

Continuing Controversy

The president-elect maintained that extremely serious issues had been referred to the governing body and that he remained president-elect.

His comment added that he was "proud and thankful to have the support of significantly more than half of university members" who supported a "secure voting process and oppose efforts to undermine the electoral process".

Critics have argued that any failure to remove him would "signal to the world that the Oxford Union has chosen ideology over integrity".

External Reactions

On recently, Mikey McCoy read out an public message to the Oxford Union on a related program broadcast.

The letter criticized the society of becoming a institution where "presidents of the union openly applaud the killing of a ideological rival".

The statement indicated that if the student were to keep his position, Kirk's allies would "directly reach out to every U.S. political figure who has ever spoken at the society and urge them never again to lend their name".

The Oxford Union had earlier criticized the student's remarks after Kirk's death and stated that concerns submitted about him had been referred for official review.

The president-elect had been one of multiple members to debate with the activist at the union in May.